The frequency of Israeli attacks on Syrian soil has intensified in recent months, based on repeated air strikes on military and civilian sites, to the direct foray of the Governor of Daraa, in a framework that analysts considered part of a wider attempt to rebuild Synia.
Syria has experienced a series of intense Israeli attacks in the past two days, targeting sites in Damascus, its campaign, Homs and Hama, including the bomb attack on the scientific research building in the Barzeh district, the destruction of the tracks of Hama airport, and a wild incursion near the Jubailiy barrage in Daraa, and the Army of Israeli. South Syria.
In response, the Syrian Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned these attacks as a “blatant violation of international law” and called on the international community to take a firm position, and Turkey has joined the conviction, since Israel seeks to keep Syria “divided and weak”.
In this context, Dr. Moayad Ghazlan Kablawi, the writer and political researcher, believes that the Syrian position remains adhering to international diplomacy, rejecting the Israeli violations in progress on the basis of “unacceptable” apology.
In his speech on the program “Path of Events”, he indicates that Israel aims to ignite an internal conflict in Syria by giving certain social components, but the majority of Syrians – according to Kablawi – bet on the cohesion of the internal front, in particular after the recent agreements with “SDF” in Aleppo.
Keblawi believes that the cohesion of the Syrian inner front and the unity of popular ranks represent an essential force in the face of challenges, worries about Israel, and indicates that the Syrian people give priority to economic resumption, but at the same time, they are ready to resist any Israeli attempt to destabilize or divide the country.
He also warns against the return of Iran and Hezbollah in the foreground if climbing continues, stressing that Syria is counting on Arab and international pressure to stop the aggression, by subjecting complaints to the Security Council and the International Court of Justice to violate the 1974 engagement agreement and the international decisions concerned.
Real goal
In turn, Dr. Muhannad Mustafa, an Israeli affairs expert, considers that Israel justifies his attacks by “protecting the security of the North population” is not the real objective of its aggression, but rather that Israel wants to prevent the emergence of a strong, economically and military strategic threat, because all Syrian growth is a strategic threat.
He adds that Israel believes that this is the reason for the overthrow of the Bashar Al -Assad regime through his strikes against the Iranian axis, he therefore seeks to impose his hegemony in the future of Syria, and he also includes real objectives – according to Mustafa – to prevent the Turkish presence in Syria, while Ankara constitutes a regional competitor.
Mustafa believes that Israel seeks to break Syrian geography, feeding internal “internal” fights, while preserving the communication channels with groups inside Syria, and by exploiting the “minority” file to achieve this objective.
The expert excludes that Israel is ready for a natural or neutral relationship with Syria in light of recent changes, stressing that the fixed Israeli strategy is not to allow the presence of a strong state alongside him.
Mustafa notes that Israel will not withdraw from occupied areas, except with 3 scenarios: external military pressure, which is currently not possible, or a peace agreement which requires normalization with the new Syrian regime, or direct American pressure, which seems improbable, according to its appreciation, in the light of the Turkish American American consensus on the role of Ankara in Syria.
Unacceptable
In the same context, professor of international relations at Turkish National Defense University, Dr. Muhammad Ozkan, believes that Ankara considers Israeli attacks as “unacceptable and violation of international law”.
And he claims that Türkiye considers Syria’s stability as an essential interest in this, and that Israeli attacks are hampering Ankara’s efforts to achieve this stability.
Ozkan explains that Türkiye seeks to achieve stability in Syria by diplomatic means, and confirms that he does not want to face Israel, and that the priority must be to help Syrians recover and restore their recovery after the war years.
He believes that Turkish-Syrian military cooperation is possible, as a natural affair between two adjacent states, but it will not take the form of joint operations, noting that Ankara counts on diplomacy and saves time to recover Syria and that “time in favor of stability”.
The three analysts are unanimously contained that Israeli escalation in Syria is not isolated from a broader context linked to the rearrangement of articles in the region, and that the absence of real deterrence encouraged Israel to carry out the strategy of “progressive biting”.
Syrians face – according to analysts – two major rights: the first, to improve internal cohesion and reject any attempt to destabilize national harmony, and the second, to mobilize Arab and international pressure through the Arab States League and the Security Council to force Israel to respect international law.