The scandal that flees sensitive information through segenal demand, in which senior American officials, was involved in the communication platform, after shaking the corridors of the White House.
The scandal was to add a journalist to a secret conversation which includes 18 senior officials of the US administration, who discussed the details of the military attack on Yemen.
The editor-in-chief of the magazine “Atlantique”, Jeffrey Goldberg, revealed the details of this unexpected conversation, notably in his Vice-President of Members, Minister of Defense, Minister of Foreign Affairs, National Security Advisor, Treasury Secretary and Director of National Intelligence.
The group had an interesting name, the “Small Houthi Group”.
The White House approved the validity of these talks, confirming the group’s editor -in -chief in error, but he denied having discussed all war plans.
Reaction
The incident raised serious questions about information security and the confidentiality of government communications, while the network of network (2025/25/25) monitored the interaction of large tweets with this problem.
“Confused America manages a war of war against Yemen from Seghenal! A deliberate attempt to divert the attention of military failure and to promote a lie that the battle for Europe when it is to protect the Israeli enemy.”
Youssef commented: “The scandal is great, and among lawyers, they said it was a scandal that can shake the throne (American president Donald) Trump and strike all those responsible who participated in the group within the request.
For his part, Samir saw that “the America’s scandal reveals the fragility of its decision! Even” signal request “” has become a witness to their catastrophic failure to face the will of Yemen “.
Abdullah underlined another dimension in the case, given that “their choice of editor -in -chief of journalist – in chief is a deliberate error and that conversations are messages which are intended for indirectly for a specific part for a specific purpose”.
Holding these talks outside the safe government channels may be a violation of the spying law. The superior democrats of parliamentary committees demanded responses to the possibility of the security of soldiers participating in military operations.