A federal judge of the American state of Vermont asked if the Trump administration would increase a “constitutional crisis” that a Turkish student from TAFS university has not been released from a migrant detention center if he concluded that his detention is illegal.
The judge of the American partial court, William Sessions, raised this possibility during a hearing in Berlington, in Vermont, when he indicated that he could order the authorities to transfer Turkish student Romisa Ozturk from the Louisiana detention center during which she was seated approximately 3 weeks in Vermont where she was held shortly after her arrest.
The judge listened to procedural procedures in the trial brought by the 30 -year -old student who stabbed his detention after a Federal Massachusetts judge transferred the case to Vermont instead of rejecting or sending him to Louisiana as wanted the United States Ministry of Justice.
A video clip that has largely widespread the arrest of Ozturk by masked police staff on a street in the suburbs of Sumalille in Boston, transforming his case into an important example of President Donald Trump’s efforts to expel pro -Palestinians in American universities who protested against the war of extermination launched by Israel.
Michael Dracher, an acting prosecutor at Vermont, argued that the case does not belong to the Vermont and that the “vast discretionary authority” granted by the Congress to the executive power to supervise immigration means that the sessions of the judge do not have the authority to release it.
Sessions, which was appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton, admitted that the question was involved in an “ambiguous field of the law”, but said that the Drish argument had raised a fundamental question about what the administration would do if he was heading in favor of Ozturk.
“If the government says after that:” No … it cannot be released because we have a question of immigration detention, which cannot be raped, and it will not be released, then we will be in a constitutional crisis, “said Schens.
Dracher replied that “he does not want to examine the question in any way he suggests that we will not be attached to the court”, but he declared that the law is clear that Ozturk must follow his liberation under bail before a judge of the Department of Immigration, and not of the sessions.
The only basis provided by the American authorities to cancel the Ozturk visa was an article of opinion which he participated in the writing criticizing the response of the university of students to withdraw his investments from companies which have relations with Israel after the start of the Gaza war and which “recognized the Palestinians subject to a collective genocide”.
His lawyers for the American American Liberties Union argue that his detention represents a clear violation of freedom of expression and his rights to freedom of expression and legal procedures due under the American Constitution, which requires his release immediately.