Netanyahu generally rejoices, indicating that he is the envoy of a “spiritual / hidden” force the supporter and supporting him to finish his project on the “new Middle East” – which is the term “sweet” for the meaning From the great Israel – and that his “message” to the world was subject to the fate of the war on the Lebanese front, while he was confident as if the “guarantee card” of this hidden force in his pocket was attached, attached to The map of this “Oriental Oriental them,” used by Netanyahu as “ointment” and “Kinder” of the Israeli injury bleeding since the seventh October 2023, while others of its political incubator, the most moderate and the most sober, believe that he is “utopia” and like those who ask “Laban al -asfour” as he says the popular Arabic proverb.
Israel – Since his defeat in the war “October / Ramadan” 1973 – has not won any victory over civilians and camps, and he was stuck after more than 15 months of barbarism in a camp the size of “Jabalia” And a little meters in the villages of southern Lebanon, but she did not speak of her dissatisfaction with “Minor Israel”, and that he is on his way to fulfill his “Major version” under the new banner of the Middle East.
And as they say, “adultery on debt / ears” is a question of magic, the scene has been exported within the entity, journalists and commentators, to ask this demagogic a delirious reality, which takes place in the arteries of the extreme extreme populist on the right, and they speak in the predecessor that the scene after the “Hezbollah” will be an entry to Tel Aviv, to reshape the Middle East, and refer it to “peaceful region” capable of voluntarily managing conflicting interests or with a heavy stick of Israel.
This optimistic thought was not the new question. , that he wrote in the 90s of the 20th century on the “new Middle East” and it is the prophecy that the Israeli thinker, Ephraim Anbar, said: he turned out to be “empty words later “.
He was absent for a period – not in a few – it is boasting, armed with religious arguments, and with the arrogance of power on the field, and perhaps a repression and referred to the “Israeli subconscious “, Due to the progressive and mild warm scene – that the region has witnessed – since the 1970s – in preparation for the integration of Israel as a natural state in the region, and it is before flood d’Al-Aqsa, who put the stick in the steering wheel of normalization, and everything tripping the project is dispersed with the diffusion of the bodies of the victims under the destroyed ruins of Gaza.
However, a photo of an Israeli soldier was taken during operations in Gaza in June 2024, bearing a “card / card” of the great Israel on his military uniform – identical to Theodore Herzl, which was more than a century – triggered general anger in the Arab world.
The map – as it appeared on the arm of the Israeli fighter – included areas from the Nile to the Euphrates, and from Medina to Lebanon, including the land of Syria and the whole of Jordan.
It is likely that what raised the Arab anger this time was not the existence of the plan, but rather its appearance in the wider space of social media, as at the beginning of 2024, and in A recorded audio clip, an Israeli politician Avi Lipkin said: “… In the end, our borders will extend from Lebanon to the Sahara, then from the Mediterranean to the Euphrates.
Who is located on the other side of the Euphrates? The Kurds! And the Kurds are friends. So, we have the Mediterranean Sea behind us, the Kurds in front of us and Lebanon, who really needs the umbrella to protect Israel, and then I think we will take control of Mecca, Medina and Mount Sinai, and Purify these places “according to his sick illusions.
This clip did not receive angry reactions at the time, and perhaps this is due to the fact that war was at its stages, with all its “delicious” demonstrations of the collapse of the institutions of the “country Invincible “and growth in printing accompanying” al -nasr al -ghazi “, that there is that there is the Middle East, formed in the uterus of the invisible, it can be without” Israel “.
However, the “Greater Israel / Middle East” project has gained more of them and renewed attention, with the tactical success obtained by Netanyahu, in the first stadiums of its war against Hezbollah (liquidate the majority of its political leaders, safety and field).
While the Israeli regional expansion, with its religious / historical justifications, and its objectivity, has remained – in the Arab world the hands of the political opposition, which it uses to condemn the Arab regimes that you see “tolerant” with the project, he was subject – with each crisis – to severe tests in Israeli elite circles, or to be included at the head of the agenda of institutions of institutions research, concerned about the future of the Middle East, and starts from the roots and origins of the problem, such as the question of determining the degree of scientific requests from Herzl in the field, and some have concluded that there is an agreement to Large scale between researchers that the Bible does not represent a scientific historical source, and therefore the novel to return to Israel or a great Israel, it can be linked to a dialectical discourse, and not a detailed history of the region or demographic facts on the ground.
Professor Ekaterina Matoy, director of the Mepei partnership program with the Mepei – Herzl and the assets on which his expansionist structure was established for a discussion closer to the health health test from which he draws legitimacy that has the ability to persuade to persuade or measure the distance which separates it from the project as a historical and deferred inevitability.
She asked: if this land is Israeli, then why is it bought from existing legal angels? And if the thesis of the earth “arid” was promoted by the media, or “the vacant land”, according to “Herzl”, then why do the Israelis buy it?
To conclude the program in the saying: we can confirm that the nature of the requests of Herzl linked to the earth is not scientific, when there were reasons which prompted the Zionist movement to reflect on an independent Jewish state, at The location and the method of implementing these a project was the subject of longer negotiations with the guarantors of power at that time, that is to say the old colonial powers, in Germany, then the United States at A later era, and it was subjective agreements.
And if the objectives of self-government and self-protection have been achieved by Herzl, then this self-protection is strongly based on American and European military aid to date, which means that “Greater Israel / The new Middle East “remains an international decision and not a local Israeli, which is the impossible decision, due to the geopolitical interests of the great powers in the Middle East.
In this context, Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security, which was created in 2017 and insists on the importance of unified Jerusalem as the basis of state security and national identity of people who live in “Zion “According to his claim … satisfaction:” It is naive to believe that an event can change the political scene in an entire region. The United States Saddam Hussein – two events that have had a major international influence – had little local or international policy in the Middle East.
The Institute believes that the complex network of local and international dynamics does not encourage peaceful coexistence, and if the pursuit of a more peaceful Middle East is a noble project, according to its assertion, it remains an arduous task Current time.
And this ends with the saying: “The lesson that Israel must learn is that it will have to live on its sword for many years to come, and although the periods of reduced tension, like those which appreciate Egypt and the Jordan certainly possible, he does not quantitatively reflect a different bilateral relationship, such as the relationship between Canada and the United States, and the transition of a non-violent relationship with an armed conflict can be Producing quickly, and Israel must be ready for this possibility.
There is no significant indication that Israel can abandon this objective, or he can abandon the project of great Israel, however, the main idea which appears in the arguments which defend the project of Greater Israel, that is to say -Dire the “new” last age can actually be represented.
While the world approaches the end of the main oil era, commercial roads are doubled at both levels; Global and regional and new model changes will be necessary for the major traditional powers in order to compete peacefully with emerging industrial and commercial forces.
Although Israel has relative independence – as it claims – and increases its share in the protection of itself, the importance of foreign support can remain an essential element in its regional policy, and during the analysis of the project From the great Israel, we must take into account if the potential The permanent state of war is compatible with aspirations for economic development in peacetime, which is supposed to compete with the economic forces in rapid growth in a new era, which makes ‘Idea of “The great Israel / the new Middle East” a myth comes up against any solid and rational reading, if it is not a long dream and at the same time, and in conjunction with the growing trend of the revenge of such Aviv in The region which is “the eye”, and also in parallel with the supply of the supply of an Israeli Israeli stream, it has become more convinced than the new Middle East … can actually be formed in the long term, but without the state of Israel.
The opinions of the article do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Al-Jazeera.