CNBC said that “the American navy asked its members not to use the” Chinese “company of DEPC in any case.
The warning, which was sent via E -Mail on Friday, January 24, is noted from the title “An alert to the members of the crew”, noting “of the possible and moral concerns linked to the source of the model and its use” .
This naval warning came after the emerging Chinese company “Deep Seck” managed to develop an artificial intelligence system which competes with the leaders of the American industry according to several standards, with limited resources, compared to what giant technological companies spend.
On January 20, Liang Whitheg, who led investment funds in China, decided to invest in artificial intelligence. He managed to grasp 10,000 Sims produced by Intvidia, launching the artificial intelligence model that caused confusion among the largest American technological companies.
These companies are always in a real confusion, on how to manage “Deep Cick”, because most of them go not to give what happened as important as it is not influential in the Level of competition, especially since the reports speak of large gaps in the new Chinese baby.
The meta-PDG Mark Zuckerberg defended the investment of its company of $ 65 billion in artificial intelligence, confirming the continuation of this trend in the light of increasing competition, in particular after the appearance of the Chinese model. Zuckerberg told investors that there was a lot to learn from “Deep Seick”, but he thinks it is early to make a clear judgment on his impact on the future of artificial intelligence.
What Zuckerberg said is the “gray swan”; This name, which was launched by the American thinker of Lebanese origin, “Naseem Talib”, on the deep crisis which can put optimistic global markets with artificial intelligence, in particular after the emergence of “deep seck”.
A student in his prediction in his book “The Black Swan” on the presence of the global crisis in 2008, based on the theory of black swan, which indicates the difficulty of predicting sudden events. Where this theory is based on the dominant idea that the whole swan is white, while the presence of black Pélicans is rare and surprising.
It was beforeSheThe black B in Australia-Western, which was an unexpected event. This time in his vision of “gray swan”, he will expect the main financial collapses in the world of American technological societies, so that it is an inevitable prelude to China between China And the United States?
The contrast between the concepts of “Black Swan” and “Gray Swan” exceeds the difference in color, as well as the content. Naseem Talib considers that the American Observer looks at the risks that can be partially predicted on the markets, but he ignores or often reduces it and thus creates a gray area.
Indeed, the markets can suddenly discover that they have made an error in their expectations and their accounts, and they testify to major collapses. This is what happened with the largest company in the world, which is Anvia, which collapsed on January 27, because it lost more than $ 600 billion in its value in one day, and Talib thinks that this is an early warning of what will happen in the future in the world of Western companies.
Large American companies still consider the “in -depth” model as a Chinese bubble to spread the confusion on Oben Ai, with the aim of obstructing the project “Star Gate” launched by American President Donald Trump in the investment in the field of artificial intelligence; To prevent China from excelling in this area.
Regardless of what the American administration and its companies think, but it seems that the Chinese government pushes its companies to differentiate itself in this area, and not to confuse the global technological markets, as much as it is part of Chinese efforts – Russians to remove Western domination from the world system.
This is why China avoids any direct military confrontation with America, and this is what it has succeeded for years, despite the repeated American provocations of its involvement in a war with Taiwan, after Washington intentionally opposed His veto to the law “One China”.
China does not want to follow in the footsteps of its ally Russia in eastern Ukraine, but rather went to the opposite direction, is to destabilize the financial markets of the United States, since it is the perfect choice To dissuade Washington worldwide. In other words, by striking the domination of its societies which seek to surround any emerging enterprise. Beijing touched this with Trump’s first presidential state when he imposed more sanctions on the Chinese “Huawei” communications giant; In order to dissuade from serious competition for American telecommunications companies, led by Apple.
What was caused by the company “Deep Sik”, despite what has been said and is said about its quality and its ability to compete with the world of American technology, represents the Chinese government “a gray Swad” which has reached His goal in the world of artificial intelligence. When its low -cost approach sparked fears that large American companies have pumped numerous investments in the development of artificial intelligence, while Emerging Tray offers similar performance models and low -cost investments.
China fluently speaks the United States on the economic level, so it may not stop when a bubble is launched on the financial markets, but can go further by offering opportunities to seriously compete in the world of technology digital. This is what Chinese company Ali Baba has announced by launching a new version of its artificial intelligence models Qwen 2.5 Max, which he considers as superior to the Chinese “Deep Sik” model, and on GBT performance in terms performance, according to Reuters.
The appearance of the gray swan in the world of artificial intelligence, which can put the United States in front of a real challenge, could not “threaten the imposition of sanctions” to confront or limit it. To use the language of war, as the last step to stop the increased Chinese ramp?
The opinions of the article do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Al-Jazeera.