Political analysts believe that two avenues in difficulty now take place at the Gaza Strip, the first negotiation path to which the Palestinian resistance in Gaza adheres, and an ascending path led by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who turned against the Dédouée and the cease-Le-de-Garde in Gaza.
The Israeli army has continued to bomb residential areas with planes and artillery parallel to the foray of its forces in certain axes, in the center, south and northern Palestinian. For its part, the Al -Qassam brigades -The military wing of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) announced that it had bombed Ashkelon this afternoon with a rocket rocket in response to Israeli massacres against civilians.
According to the writer and political analyst, Ahmed Al -haila, it was Netanyahu who turned against the prisoner exchange agreement and ceasefire, because he refused to conclude the negotiations of the second stage of the agreement and did not respect the human protocol and to prevent the entry of the aid to the Gaza Strip since the first month of March, and resumed war on the Gaza Strip, and said under fire.
On the other hand, the Hamas movement still insists on adhering to the agreement and discusses the political ideas offered, including the proposals of the American envoy in the Middle East Stephen Witkev, in order to fill the differences and to go to the second stage of the agreement.
Hamas has denied what was reported by the Israeli newspaper Yediot Aharonot “concerning the reduction of communications or the judgment of talks linked to the prisoner exchange agreement, and said that it was still at the heart of negotiations and that monitoring with responsibility and gravity with mediators.
In her conversation with the “Path of Events” program-the trick was maintained as a mediator in negotiations between Hamas and the Occupation, direct responsibility for current climbing in the Gaza Strip, indicating that it went from the idea of mediation to the idea of the party and asked: why did the American administration not need Netanyahu with what was agreed and signed?
He stressed that “the American administration makes a mistake, and while the Israeli Prime Minister managed to lead the administration of former president Joe Biden to the affection of the problem in the Gaza Strip, it seems that current President Donald Trump takes place on the same line”.
Al -Haila added that Netanyahu was able to convince the Trump administration that the military approach could eliminate resistance and move the Palestinians, an objective whose Israeli occupation still speaks, as the Israeli Defense Minister Yisrael Katz said two days ago.
US administration identifies
He said the US administration had started to identify with this objective and give the Israeli occupation political and military coverage, and the trick considered that it is crazy to use the same tools and methodologies and that there are different results of what happened for 15 months of the Israeli war on Gaza.
He also pointed out that internal conflicts in Israel will affect Netanyahu’s objectives, but the Palestinians do not count on this subject, but rather have their strengths in the face of Israeli occupation.
Ihab Jabareen, the author of Israeli affairs, supports the trick that Netanyahu was responsible for leaving the prisoner exchange agreement and ceasefire in Gaza, where he made crises in order to dive into this agreement, which some Israelis clearly recognize.
Regarding the American position, Tim Constantine, the editor-in-chief of the administrator-in the “Washington Times” during his intervention on the “Path of Events” program, has not ceased to say that Hamas is responsible for the obstruction of the prisoner and cease-fire exchange agreement, saying that he did not make a concessions and insisted on the fact of staying in power.