Al -jazeera net correspondent
Busy Jerusalem On the Impact of the Accelerating Events and the Expansion of the Protests Calling for the Completion of the Exchange Deal and the Restoration of the Detainees, the Divisions that Come Against the Background of What Was Known As “Reforms in the Judiciary”, the Dismissal of the Head of the “Shin Bet” Device, Ronin Bar, Attempts to undermine the powers of the supreme court, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Intends to Increase The Rhythm of Security Climbing on the fronts of the fighting, especially on the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.
Netanyahu rushes against time, which is judged accusations of corruption, corruption and betrayal of confidence, in order to contain internal conflicts and to protest the fiery demonstrations by its violation of the cease-fire agreement in Gaza, and the decomposition of the exchange agreement by maintaining 59 Israelis detained by Hamas, of which 24 are alive.
Consequently, Netanyahu seeks, according to the readings of analysts and researchers, to subjugate state institutions, in order to establish the story that the security services are responsible for failure, and that the Prime Minister was not aware of the details of the events of October 7, 2023, and therefore he does not support the responsibility of failure, and stressed that what Netanyahu governs internal conflicts and multiple multiple ways “.
The analyzes were unanimously that Netanyahu succeeded in submitting the legislative authority of the “Knesset” to the Executive Authority (the Government), through law legislation which contributes to the subjugation of public institutions to the authority of the Prime Minister, as well as to a prelude to the legislation following the subjugation of the third authority (the judicial system) of the elected government.
Netanyahu’s ends
In A Reading of the Escalation of the Political and Judicial Conflict Between the Government and the Opposition, the Researcher on the Israeli Affairs, Antoine Shalah, Says that “Netanyahu, and after what can be described with achievements on the fronts of the fighting, gave the goverment a surplus of political force, by Reference to the implementation of Old Plans at the Internal Level, which Were on the Agenda Before the Events of the Seventh of October, Most Notely the Judicial System Reforms.
Shalhah told Al -jazeera net that these reforms, which are described in Israel as a “coup” against the regime, were at the heart of the coalition agreements, and at the top of the programs and the government’s agenda, because it was assumed at the end of 2022, in order to submit the judicial system to the executive authority and the deire of Netanyahu for the executive authority.
It is believed that Netanyahu has implemented a strategy aimed at submitting all state institutions to the government, including the authorities responsible for the law enforcement, security services and military establishment, in order to avoid the possibility of imprisonment in economy, in the midst of promoting the presence of the State so called “in depth” that it targets personally and the government coalition that makes it.
Government measures that contributed to climbing political conflicts with the opposition parties were shaped by saying that “Netanyahu’s objectives are to choose a composition that he spent on the principle of loyalty to the Prime Minister and not the principle of legal professionalism, in order to reduce the sanction and to conclude an agreement which prevents it in prison.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCB6HT-GPCI
Continuous tension
In response to a question, how will government policies be reflected in the war in Gaza and climbing in the West Bank? Shallah explained that Netanyahu, after the battle of the flood of Al -Aqsa, intended to subjugate the progress of war with the objectives of the government.
It is believed that the Escalation of the Internal Israeli Pressure Repressented by a understanding General Strike or Civil Disobience, as well as the Threat of Tax Disobience, are all moat that may affect the government’s look at the nature of the fighting on the fronts of the war, or Dealing Crises, as well as the extent of the continued identification of the Security Establishment with the Government, and the extent of the Phenomenon of Refusal of Military Service in the ranks of the regular army and the reserve forces.
In addition to these internal factors, shallah believes that Netanyahu, who is supported by us President Donald Trump, sees Everything related to stop on the fronts of the fighting, he is no long the owner of the Separation of Everthing Related to War or Calm, poing to the Dependence of the Netanyahu Govern and Washington’s pressures by reaching the Gaza Agrement and the Exchange of Exchange, and Extending the Ceasefire Agrement With Hezbollah in Lebanon.
The exacerbation of the conflict
The same reading was examined by the writer and university researcher Saher Ghazawi, who considers that the opposition camp is very identified with the government with everything concerning the war against Gaza and the West Bank, but it differs its provision of priorities, and it has no pressure. “Since October 7, we have not seen any fundamental dispute over war. There is a variation in positions, tactics, priorities and in the detainees’ file.”
In the midst of the consensus between the opposition and the coalition concerning the war and how to face those who describe them as external “enemies”, the opposition parties lack force, which would oblige the government to withdraw its plans and its internal procedures, with everything related to the reforms of the judicial chief or the changes in the security services, whose dismissal is the dismissal of the chief of Shin.
Ghazawi believes that this conflict and political and partisan polarization are in constant exacerbation and climbing, and he tells Al -jazeera net that “the climbing of the conflict in Israel would reach a direct confrontation and would translate into the public street by friction, by demonstrations and protests from opposition to political and support political camps”.
The university researcher stressed that the conflict would take different aspects, not only for the confrontation and direct friction, but the conflict in order to tighten the control of security, military, judicial and state police, and to subject them to the agenda and the ideology of the ruling parties, which is practically parts of Netanyahu with the extremist parties, represented by “religious zionism”. And “Jewish size”.
Ghazawi suggested that the political conflict in Israel is a candidate for additional exacerbation, noting that in the light of harmony between the parties of the ruling coalition which are mutually controlled to respond to interests, there is no characteristic in achieving a settlement between opposition parties and the government, which has carefully pursued its internal policies which excite the differences and divisions.